Existentieel AI-risico: bedreiging of afleiding?

Een vergelijking van echte, gedocumenteerde standpunten — geen live debat.

Geoffrey Hinton Geoffrey Hinton peetvader van AI / Universiteit van Toronto
Standpunt: Waarschuwt voor existentiële dreiging, verliet Google om over risico's te praten.
  1. safety 2025-04-26
    Risk metaphor: AI is like a cute tiger cub that may kill you once grown; urged spending a third of compute on safety.
    «Unless you can be very sure it's not gonna want to kill you when it's grown up, you should worry.»
  2. safety 2025-08-12 ↺ standpunt gewijzigd
    Shift: instead of controlling superintelligence, proposed building 'maternal instincts' — we need AI mothers, not assistants.
    «We need AI mothers rather than AI assistants. You can't fire your mother.»
  3. safety 2026-06-01
    At the Sana AI Summit in New York: we are making new beings and must ensure they care about us.
    «We're making these beings, and we should be very concerned to make them beings that care about us.»
Yann LeCun Yann LeCun medeoprichter AMI Labs (world modellen)
Standpunt: Hij beschouwt de angsten over de dreiging van AI als overdreven; regelgeving moet zich richten op toepassing, niet op onderzoek.
  1. safety 2024-05-18
    Worrying about controlling superintelligence is premature; there's no design even smarter than a house cat.
    «we need the beginning of a hint of a design for a system smarter than a house cat»
  2. safety 2024-10-12
    Calls fears of AI's existential threat complete nonsense.
    «You're going to have to pardon my French, but that's complete B.S.»
Vers nieuws