争论

人工智能存在风险:威胁还是干扰?

对真实、有据可查的立场的对比——并非面对面辩论。

Geoffrey Hinton Geoffrey Hinton AI教父 / 多伦多大学
立场: 他警告存在主义威胁,离开谷歌是为了谈论风险。
  1. safety 2025-04-26
    Risk metaphor: AI is like a cute tiger cub that may kill you once grown; urged spending a third of compute on safety.
    «Unless you can be very sure it's not gonna want to kill you when it's grown up, you should worry.»
  2. safety 2025-08-12 ↺ 立场转变
    Shift: instead of controlling superintelligence, proposed building 'maternal instincts' — we need AI mothers, not assistants.
    «We need AI mothers rather than AI assistants. You can't fire your mother.»
  3. safety 2026-06-01
    At the Sana AI Summit in New York: we are making new beings and must ensure they care about us.
    «We're making these beings, and we should be very concerned to make them beings that care about us.»
Yann LeCun Yann LeCun AMI Labs(世界模型)联合创始人
立场: 他认为对人工智能威胁的担忧被夸大了;应该监管的是应用,而非研究。
  1. safety 2024-05-18
    Worrying about controlling superintelligence is premature; there's no design even smarter than a house cat.
    «we need the beginning of a hint of a design for a system smarter than a house cat»
  2. safety 2024-10-12
    Calls fears of AI's existential threat complete nonsense.
    «You're going to have to pardon my French, but that's complete B.S.»
最新新闻