論争

AIの実存的リスク:脅威か、注意散漫か?

実際に引用可能な立場を比較したものであり、直接対決ではありません。

Geoffrey Hinton Geoffrey Hinton AIの名付け親 / トロント大学
立場: 「存在論的脅威」を警告し、グーグルを去ってリスクについて語る
  1. safety 2025-04-26
    Risk metaphor: AI is like a cute tiger cub that may kill you once grown; urged spending a third of compute on safety.
    «Unless you can be very sure it's not gonna want to kill you when it's grown up, you should worry.»
  2. safety 2025-08-12 ↺ 立場変更
    Shift: instead of controlling superintelligence, proposed building 'maternal instincts' — we need AI mothers, not assistants.
    «We need AI mothers rather than AI assistants. You can't fire your mother.»
  3. safety 2026-06-01
    At the Sana AI Summit in New York: we are making new beings and must ensure they care about us.
    «We're making these beings, and we should be very concerned to make them beings that care about us.»
Yann LeCun Yann LeCun AMI Labs(ワールドモデル)共同創業者
立場: AIの脅威に関する懸念は誇張されていると考える。規制すべきは研究ではなく、応用だ。
  1. safety 2024-05-18
    Worrying about controlling superintelligence is premature; there's no design even smarter than a house cat.
    «we need the beginning of a hint of a design for a system smarter than a house cat»
  2. safety 2024-10-12
    Calls fears of AI's existential threat complete nonsense.
    «You're going to have to pardon my French, but that's complete B.S.»
新着ニュース