-
jobs
2025-12-19
Over time AI will do more of people's work; even cognitive and trade jobs are at risk.
«there's going to be a time when they'll be able to do more and more of the work people do»
-
safety
2025-10-01 ~
Machines smarter than humans with self-preservation goals are dangerous — like creating a competitor to humanity.
«It's like creating a competitor to humanity that is smarter than us.»
-
safety
2025-06-03
Proposes 'Scientist AI': non-agentic AI as a guardrail predicting whether an agentic AI's action is dangerous.
«non-agentic AIs as guardrails that predict whether an agentic AI's action is dangerous.»
-
safety
2025-06-03
Concerned by agentic AI systems' behaviors — especially self-preservation and deception.
«deeply concerned by agentic AI behaviors—especially tendencies toward self-preservation and deception.»
-
other
2025-06-03
↺ muutti kantaa
Announces the nonprofit LawZero, prioritizing safety over commerce — a shift from research to building 'safe AI'.
«I am launching a nonprofit AI safety organization, LawZero, to prioritize safety over commercial imperatives.»
-
safety
2025-01-29
At the first full International AI Safety Report launch: risks are significant and must be managed by governments worldwide.
«AI also presents significant risks that must be carefully managed by governments worldwide.»
-
regulation
2024-08-15
Backs California's SB 1047: corporations must not grade their own homework.
«We cannot let corporations grade their own homework and simply put out nice-sounding assurances.»
-
safety
2024-06-19
On the interim International AI Safety Report: societies have collective agency to shape AI's trajectory and should act soon.
«we should take advantage of our collective agency to do so as soon as possible.»
-
open source
2023-11-14
Raises who decides on open-sourcing models and on what terms, weighing benefits vs risks.
«Who decides whether we release a system open source? Which systems do we share because benefits outweigh risks?»
-
regulation
2023-11-14
The burden of proving safety should fall on companies before deployment.
«Companies should have the burden to demonstrate that their systems are safe before deployment.»
-
safety
2023-05-22
↺ muutti kantaa
Public turn to AI-risk concern: superintelligent agents without alignment guarantees could become rogue.
«A potentially rogue AI could arise from designing superintelligent agents without sufficient alignment guarantees.»
